I found this article, and really at a good time too, as I reading through a debate on global warming and all the man made/ or not, or w/e other crap comes along with it, and of course it doesn’t really matter if it’s man made or not, GW is another issue altogether… I’m pretty sure most people here know that a change in the way the human race (or civilizations at least) are living will actually be beneficial!
The point of the article states a psychological way of going about this debate with people… instead of saying a ‘we must do this or else’ it presents a doing this to better our lives.
Well I’ll shut up and let the article speak for itself
I think there's a terrific psychological difference determined by the frame of mind in which one takes certain actions… There's not much joy in taking defensive actions. But if you can think of it as contributing to "the repair of the world," then you have a totally different view of the action. Now you can really be happy about it: you have made a difference (however small) by this action. Over time, [this point] of view [can] have an effect on your personality and character. The defensive or "forced to do this" motivation tends to harden and closes you, shutting you away from others. The "repair of the world" motivation tends to awaken compassion in you, to soften you towards others. –Pat Meadows
so uhh… what to post here, how about quick, positives (not anti-negatives, like it cuts down pollution, etc, those can come later) about rewilding, quick arguments to help motivate each other and loved ones, or those against it to uhh, see some light in it.
[hr]Admin note: fixed the link