Resistance Vs. Rewilding

Hey peeps. I wrote this for my blog but I thought i’d post it here for discussion:

Resistance Vs. Rewilding

When I think of “resistance movements" I envision a small group of people resisting against a much larger and all-powerful militarized machine. To think of civilization as an all-powerful death machine, the idea of resisting makes me feel small and paralyzed. But when viewed through the eyes of rewilding, resistance looks and feels very different.

Civilization works as way of life that attempts to domesticate, to tame, to make dependent (read: enslave) the whole world. Most basically it fuels its population growth through the domestication of plants. It cannot exist without domestication. It also must work constantly to make its domesticated members so; brain washing people through television and schooling, genetically engineering plants, growing meat in petri dishes, etc. Civilization does so much work to keep the world domesticated because domestication works as a form of resistance against the natural flow of the world, which always wants to rewild.

When a tree’s roots slowly tear up concrete, the tree does not resist the concrete, the concrete resists the tree. The tree just lives its life the way all wild things do. Plants do what they can with their resources to keep the world wild. Dams resist the natural flow of a river. Over many thousands of years, if left alone, the water would whittle the dam down to nothing. The water never resisted the dam. It only did what water does to keep the world wild.

Populations of wild plants and animals that wild humans could eat for food have nearly disappeared through civilization’s domestication. Wild humans, as elements integral to the landscape, require an undomesticated land in order to live. If we mean to rewild, it implies that like the water and trees doing what they can to rewild the planet, rewilding humans need to use the our unique, in-born tools to rewild the world.

For example; civilization has domesticated the Columbia River and all her tributaries killing nearly all of the wild salmon who once lived there. If Cascadians want to live as wild humans, they will need to rewild the Columbia River. Of course, the river itself works as fast as its water can to break away the dam. Unfortunately for the fish and other members of Cascadia, the water alone cannot work fast enough to rewild the river. But rewilding humans, whose ability to make tools comes as naturally as a trees ability to grow roots, can work much faster to undomesticate that river.

Resistance or Rewilding? Same actions, different perspectives. Some may argue that this merely sounds like semantics and that may prove true. Some people may feel empowered by the resistance paradigm, and others may not. I see it as a paradigm shift due to the different emotional responses I personally experience with these words. When I turn the resistance paradigm on its head and see civilization working as a small resistance movement against the much larger and more powerful natural world, I feel empowered; civilization does not have the power to resist the flow of the wild world.

Many argue over whether or not actions like blowing up a dam will bring civilization down or merely strengthen it. To wild humans, an argument like that makes no sense. Like arguing over whether or not the tree whose roots tear up the sidewalk will bring down civilization or strengthen it. Yes, the tree may get cut down and the street repaved. But civilization will never have the power to cut them all down, to repave all of those streets. A dandelion growing in a suburban lawn, a tree ripping apart the street, an earthquake tearing down buildings, and rewilding humans dismantling logging equipment seems as natural a process as taking out the trash feels to the civilized. I don’t see a rewilding human blowing up a dam as resistance, but as the natural world going about its daily routines… with a little tenacity.

Many of the proponents who argue against such actions say that “civilization will just rebuild." The idea that civilization will go on resisting the roots of a tree, cut it down and pave another road, does not stop the tree from growing roots. Similarly, whether or not civilization will continue to resist the flow of water and build another dam does not stop the actions of rewilding humans. The forces of nature at work, whether we mean trees growing roots, water rushing to the ocean or wild humans caretaking the land, will continue to undomesticate the world regardless of civilization’s growing or diminishing resistance to them.

The mythologists of civilization use the actions of rewilding humans to further their own destruction and may hunt down and kill rewilding humans, but they will never kill them all. Deep down we all have the genetic code to live wild lives, despite the external memetic system of domestication that most of us currently subscribe to. As civilization collapses more people will realize the need to rewild and will have more and more success rewilding body, mind, river, country, forest, farm and city.

When we join up with the wild forces of the world, when we rewild, we become unstoppable.

i think it is a testament to our(that means you and I) total nerosis (frouid said as much that this would be the result of the full development of civilization) that this conversation is still going on after 8 years!! at least of which i’ve been aware. lets all be honest with ourselves. we are scared shitless of the government, and of there reps; the police. we believe no matter how much we logically know it not to be the case that the state is omnipresent and is totally capable of stopping us. because their propaganda with which we’ve been subjected to since childhood works. we’re terrified, terrorized (by the state). i think after we come to terms with that then we get the shit dome and take responsibility for our actions. simple as that.

You are terrified, why is it necessary for you to find someone as scared as you to have a conversations(anticivirus)?

I am not afraid. For some of the same reasons listed above, I have no reason to be afraid. The shrill voices of the left no longer overpower the shrill voices of the right in my mind, it has all fallen away so that I may listen to the wind.

There are 16,000 independent police forces in this country. There are 980,000 police officers. You’re SCARED of that?

You mean to tell me, that in a room of 300 people, the ONE person, the ONE PERSON with a badge AND a GUN is the person you are the most afraid of?

That’s scary, really? Do you know something I don’t?


Honestly, we just need more friends that are like us, where if the bunch of us quietly pulled out a few pins form time to time, it wouldn’t look like a resistance movement. No one ever took a tree to court for cracking a mainline…

Living life is the most important thing to all of us. How and where are we going to do it?

We need more living examples that come from this set of peers RIGHT HERE for us to have the bio-regional success that makes so much logical sense.

Bravo Tony, nice response.

I’m less scared of the one person with a badge and a gun than I am of the 298 other people in the room who will look the other way while he beats me.

To me, it seems every successful resistance movement has had the ability to produce it’s own food. They could go to ground. I don’t think that very many resistance-minded people in the US can do that. I think until we can feed the people without the system, we can’t get rid of the system. I think in that regard, hunting and gathering and gardening are the most revolutionary things we can do right now.

But that’s just what I think. I certainly wouldn’t try to stop anyone from taking a more direct action.

I am new here and promise to introduce myself later. I just had to respond to the suggestion that we cannot feed the resistance. This is true up to a point. If you want to ensure a supply of food then treat every forest, glen, wild field, and wilderness as a potential site for forest gardening.

Concept is simple. Gather the open pollinated seeds of sturdy veg and grains such as amaranth. Nuts like pecans and the fruit trees. Wrap seeds in clay seed balls or leave in shells. When hiking scatter and plant the seeds. Do not worry about yields, just do it. Let nature bring forth the end result, just be the middle man.

Read “The Man Who Planted Trees” for inspiration. Do this every where you go. Nothing can ever be closer to a radical, passive, healthy way of resistance and long term food stable food supply. Some will be lost to encroaching development, natural selection, animals, fire,etc. Not your place to concern yourself with that. Just keep seeding the wild and semi-wild spaces. Find out what kinds of native fruit trees grow in your area, such as pawpaw and persimmon, and sow them. Plant figs and apples and peaches and cherries from seed. Just scatter the seed balls in every space possible. Sow gourds for future utensils and and anything else that comes to mind like medicinal herbs.

It just takes conviction and the desire to get out in nature with your backpack. Nothing could be simpler.

Nice words micpet. I couldn’t agree more.

Hi Urban Scout. This is an interesting thread. I personally view the resistance v.s. rewilding question like this: I view us rewilders as the small and unnoticed mammals at the end of the age of the dinosaurs. We are tiny, and totally unable to take on , change or influence the massive and omnipotent dinosaurs that lumber along, as we scurry under their feet.
But when their apocalypse arrived in the form of an asteroid that ended an epoch, we still survived, then thrived, and eventually dominated… …unfortunately these tiny mammals evolved into a large brained bipedal naked ape who ended up creating the empire of dominion of man. :o
No resistance as I see it, just don’t get crushed by all those falling dinosaurs…
:slight_smile:
Alex

brilliantly said alex! i love the analogy.

To add to that analogy, I’m sure the rodents feasted well on the dinosaur bodies.

Yep, I’ll second Alex. All we need to do is learn to thrive (and reproduce). That’s all the trees and weeds do to break up concrete. Nothing Civilization has built will last, because nothing civilization has built grows voluntarily (i.e. reproduces itself).

Animism is just reality – everything has a spirit, the question is “who is that spirit and what is that spirit doing?” If I look at a car and ask the car’s spirit what he’s doing, he says “rusting”. A car will never be more of a car than the day it rolled off the showroom floor. If I leave that car alone and come back in a thousand years, I’ll find that the car has voluntarily turned itself into dust. Obviously then, cars aren’t really cars and don’t want to be cars. Same goes for all the technology of civilization.

However, if I walk into the woods and ask a rabbit what it’s doing, it says “living”. If I leave that rabbit and come back in a thousand years rabbit will still be there…in the form of that first rabbit’s descendants. The spirit of Rabbit wants to be Rabbit and will continue to be Rabbit all on his own.

Likewise us. All we have to be is who we really are. If we do that, civilization will rust all around us.

A couple of additional thoughts that came to me while reading this thread:

  1. We don’t even have to go to the effort of making seed balls with our hands. What is an effortless seed ball? Scat. Make seed balls with your ass. If we eat the plants we like and shit properly in the hummus of the land, we sow our favorite seeds everywhere we go. Same as every other animal in the forest. Take a lesson from Bear, make your seed balls so natural and effortless you don’t have to do any work at all. Just thrive…eat, shit, and thrive. To put a new spin on and old quote; “free your ass, your mind will follow…” Shit wild. Shit outside.

  2. Fear is an emotion given to us to protect us from harm. It’s a natural emotion given to all mammals to help us avoid predation. If I’m a deer in a herd of deer and I spot a hunting jaguar, I would be wise to listen to my fear. If I’m in a room with 300 people and one of them is a man with a gun who is hunting the crowd for anything “against the law”, and I’m “against the law” I would be wise to listen to my fear. Fear is our friend. We need to hear him and respect him, we just don’t need to be controlled by him.

Police forces are largely made up of dangerous sociopaths who are attracted to the position because it puts them in a position of power over the rest of society, and they get to carry dangerous weapons. I forget the percentage that qualify psychologically as sociopaths, but it’s high. Also, police brutality rates are on the rise. It’s sensible to be a bit scared of them.

Being someone who stands out in most crowds, I’m subject to police harassment. Because of the fact that I do break laws, I worry about this harassment. The main thing that I have as an advantage is that I’m mostly white and look it.

Right on. I’d like to add that the rigid hierarchical struction in police forces is also part of what draws some shady characters…

yawn

I’m sure the reason you forget the percentages are because it has more to do with your perception than reality.

Don’t come down to my city(the chocolate cit) thinking you can play the white boy card… but feel free to break any but two laws

*pissing in the street

*murder

everything else is pretty okay, race regardless.

Can I ask a question…

what is it like to live in the suburbs? (maybe that’s another topic, sorry) it’s the one place I’ve only visited, never met a sociopathic cops, mostly nice people whoa re ‘giving back’, in their way, to the community…

I don’t know, I’ve met as many cops who dreamed little boy scouts dreams in their youth of helping save the world, in their own domesticated way, as the sadistic aspiring despots on a power trip. I’d guess the composition to stand somewhere close to half-and-half between misguided idealists and the utterly insane.

Of course, how long can you expect even the wisest person to wield power like that, before she goes completely mad?

eh, it’s okay. most folk are more or less nice, same as most places. seems like there’s a couple more “nosy” folk than i would expect to find elsewhere, but shrug maybe that’s just me

[quote=“jason, post:15, topic:417”]I don’t know, I’ve met as many cops who dreamed little boy scouts dreams in their youth of helping save the world, in their own domesticated way, as the sadistic aspiring despots on a power trip. I’d guess the composition to stand somewhere close to half-and-half between misguided idealists and the utterly insane.

Of course, how long can you expect even the wisest person to wield power like that, before she goes completely mad?[/quote]

i don’t know. one of the very few people (down to 3) that are on my list of folks that wouldn’t walk out of a dark alley should i happen across one there is now a deputy.

on the other hand, i’ve known a few others that seem quite decent.

in the university town i now live in, the cops brought us pizza. i’m easily won over with food and the cops here are nice enough (it’s a pretty quiet town), but if it came down to a chaotic situation… I think there are plenty of examples that show who the police are, by and large, protecting and serving.

I'm sure the reason you forget the percentages are because it has more to do with your perception than reality.

And I’m sure the reason you so easily dismissed my researched and thoroughly thought out answer involves your own privilege and inability to recognize others’ plight. In case you didn’t read my intro, I’m one class short of finishing my degree in psychology and anthropology, so I’m not very apt to go around making things up about dysfunctional mental conditions. It’s a lot less rude and presumptuous to simply ask that I produce the name of the study, which I’ll be attempting to find in my book piles when I get some spare time.

what is it like to live in the suburbs? (maybe that's another topic, sorry) it's the one place I've only visited, never met a sociopathic cops, mostly nice people whoa re 'giving back', in their way, to the community...

I can only tell you what it’s like living in a rural area that’s continually being encroached upon by the suburbs. My town is still mostly rural, but the suburban parts of it are growing. It really sucks having all these yuppies around. They continually push to raise property taxes, bring in chain businesses, drive out the independent ones, and log the forests.

And I’m sure the reason you so easily dismissed my researched and thoroughly thought out answer involves your own privilege and inability to recognize others’ plight.[/quote]

Now we see what happens when we don’t interpret generously the posts we read here. Please focus on trying to understand each other rather than jumping to conclusions.

Or I shall feel very grumpy.

[quote=“Willem, post:19, topic:417”][quote author=incendiary_dan link=topic=452.msg8366#msg8366 date=1203526341]

And I’m sure the reason you so easily dismissed my researched and thoroughly thought out answer involves your own privilege and inability to recognize others’ plight.
[/quote]

Now we see what happens when we don’t interpret generously the posts we read here. Please focus on trying to understand each other rather than jumping to conclusions.

Or I shall feel very grumpy.[/quote]

Ooh! Ooh! We need a Hammer of Bonking!!! ;D

``What ho, knave, thou has thy knickers in a twist, and shouldst removest yon hairy caterpillar from thy fundament.''

:wink: