I’m almost surprised no one has mentioned this, but then again, it sometimes feels almost taboo to bring it up… but I was talking with my dad the other day, and he mentioned to me something he’s mentioned to me before, that, because of his poor eyesight, he would not have survived in a hunter-gatherer type society, and it was only the agricultural society that allows and supports the ‘weak’ to live…
Now I realize that having acute senses has importance to said lifestyle, and such would follow the ‘survival of the fittest’ paradigm, I’m not going to define what ‘is’ and ‘isn’t’ ‘fit’ but, has civilization by supporting and allowing the ‘weak’ to live resulted in a sort of - ‘de-evolution’ (horrible word >>), or, is civilization really the cause of such?
And secondly, in a feral culture, what about glasses / eye problems?? Or if say I have a child and that child develops eye problems later in life? (This isn’t the sort of thing where the baby just doesn’t live, or has a retardation or something like that and you can tell when the baby is born…)
Now you don’t see say the (early) native Americans running around with glasses, but, what evidence do we have of what may have been done in such cases in indigenous societies, (if such arose)?