Hi everyone. I don’t believe anybody else has posted about this, but I felt I could share some experiences I’ve had about repairing my eyesight without invasive surgery or the like. My friend once told me a bit about Teddy Roosevelt, about how he would always carry a spare set of glasses in every jacket he wore. He must have had a dozen pairs, I’m told, but he spent a lot of time outdoors and, with a terrible prescription, didn’t want to be caught off guard. I don’t know if my friend embellished the detail that he felt ashamed over it.
My vision is worse than it could be, and I used to think that only eye surgery could fix this so-called genetic problem. But since last summer my sight has improved drastically. I see so many more stars, the blackboard is a piece of cake, and I can read the time in the lower right at an arm and half’s distance (started at half that). I’ve been following the Bates method, and I’ll elaborate on a few details. I recommend it whole-heartedly.
Dr. William Bates noticed, in the 1920s, that eyesight can be variable (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism). With a retinoscope, which measures the focal point of the eye, he could discern that tiny changes in “sightedness” can and do occur, an idea generally agreed upon by optometrists today. His breakthrough was to show that given one displacement, perhaps we could incite one more in the same direction, and one more, until the eye can see with clarity.
Many have published and republished his findings. Even online one can find a great wealth of knowledge (though the book I read is called Relearning to See by Thomas Quackenbush). Crucially, to repair vision, Bates advocated letting go of tension in the eye. Simple ways to begin the journey are to focus centrally, to blink more often, to appreciate movement and not try to hold things still, to relax, and to breathe naturally. The eye rests when it moves, and when we blink it jumps around. Children love to move, to rock, to spin; we can learn a lot from this.
To take a personal example, I used to have glow-in-the-dark stars on my ceiling as a kid. Perhaps somebody else has noticed this. I would stare at one star for as long as I could without blinking, without moving my eyes, and it would become blurrier and blurrier until it almost disappeared, and then I’d blink. I just had to. It’s strange I never drew the correlation myself between staring and blurriness.
The object in the center of our line of sight is always clearer than the object right next to it. Many, myself included, have developed the bad habit of trying to diffuse our vision to take in the whole scene at once, like the world is one giant television screen or windshield. This, too, accounts for a great deal of problems of tension.
If you’re interested in this, I know it sometimes sounds a bit new agey, but I really recommend you give it a look. If you’ve had similar experiences or tested the method yourself, I’d be happy to hear about it. Even if your vision is 20/20, or 20/10, I suggest you experiment with relaxing your eyes, not squinting, and focusing only on the pinprick of the center of your line of sight; you may find that there is no limit to how clear your vision can be.