After a bit of thinking I noticed that anarchy itself contradicts nature. I mean, if we have come to this place FROM a state of anarchy, then isn’t that the natural direction of life? So aren’t you in fact trying to fight the inevitable?
there is nothing “natural” about civilization.
Could you use fewer pronouns, and explain your assertions better? I don’t know exactly what you’re saying, but I’ll attempt to answer anyhow.
The cause of civilization is not a natural occurence, therefore civilization isn’t the natural direction of things. Civilization is based in agriculture, which contradicts one of the primary truths on natural, wild growth:diversity.
Also, could you introduce yourself over at the introductions thread? I also recommend reading the primer(s), especially the Thirty Theses.